Appendix VI: Literature review Nordic on shore power supply

Acciaro, M., Vanelslander, T., Sys, C., Ferrari, C., Roumboutsos, A., Giuliano, G., Lam, J.S.L., Kapros, S., 2014b. Environmental sustainability in seaports: a framework for successful innovation. Marit. Policy Manag. 41, 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03088839.2014.932926.

Acciaro, M., Wilmsmeier, G., 2015. Energy efficiency in maritime logistics chains. Res.an actor focus perspective of on shore power supply (OPS) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.11.002.

Asgari, N., Hassani, A., Jones, D., Nguye, H.H., 2015. Sustainability ranking of the UK major ports: methodology and case study. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 78, 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.01.014.

Barregard, L. (2019). Health benefits from the SECA regulation in the baltic sea. Paper presented at the EnviSuM,

Bartlett, C. (2015). Cold ironing makes a comeback. Seatrade Magazine, 125-126. Retrieved from https://www.mynewsdesk.com/material/document/43607/download?resource_type=resource_document.

Bergqvist, R., Monios, J., 2019. Green ports in theory and practice. In: Bergqvist, R., Monios,

J. (Eds.), Green Ports. Elsevier, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0- 12-814054- 3.00001-3.

Bishop, G.A., Schuchmann, B.G., Stedman, D.H., Lawson, D.R., 2012. Emission changes resulting from the San Pedro Bay, California ports truck retirement program. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1021/es202392g.

Bjerkan, K.Y., Seter, H., 2019. Reviewing tools and technologies for sustainable ports: does research enable decision making in ports? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ.

CARB, 2015. Greenhouse Gas Quantification Methodology for the Air Resources Board: Low Carbon Transportation Program. California Air Resources Board, USA. https:// doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132886.

CARB/EPA, 2015a. Technology Assessment: Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment. California Air Resources Board & Environmental Protection Agency, USA.

Cavotec, M. (2011). Making cold ironing make sound business sense. Retrieved from https://www.porttechnology.org/technical-papers/making_cold_ironing_make_sound_business_sense/.

Cavotec. (2011). Cavotec shore power application opened in Karlskrona, Sweden. Retrieved from https://www.mynewsdesk.com/cavotec/blogposts/cavotec-shore-power-application-opened-in- karlskrona-sweden-5777.

Chen, G., Govindan, K., Golias, M.M., 2013. Reducing truck emissions at container terminals in a low carbon economy: proposal of a queueing- based bi-objective model for optimizing truck arrival pattern. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 55, 3–22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.03.008.

Chiu, R.H., Lin, L.-H., Ting, S.-C., 2014. Evaluation of green port factors and performance: a fuzzy AHP analysis. Math. Probl. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/802976.

Clean Shipping Index. (2020a). Clean shipping index - clean ships sailing in healthy seas. Retrieved from https://www.cleanshippingindex.com/.

Clean Shipping Index. (2020b). Clean shipping index benefits. Sweden: Clean Shipping Index. Retrieved fromhttp://cleanshippingindex.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/20180905-Clean-Shipping-Index-Benefits.pdf.

Clean Shipping Index. (2020c). Methodology and reporting guidelines. Sweden: Clean Shipping Index. Retrieved from https://www.cleanshippingindex.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/2020-05-26-Methodology-Reporting-Guidelines.pdf.

Davarzani, H., Fahimnia, B., Bell, M., Sarkis, J., 2016. Greening ports and maritime lo- gistics: a review. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 48, 473–487. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.trd.2015.07.007.

DNV GL, 2016. Assessment of Clean Energy Measures for California Ports. Prepared by DNV GL for California Energy Commission.

Du, K., Monios, J., Wang, Y., 2019. Green port strategies in China. In: Bergqvist, R., E-Harbours Electric, 2012. Innovative Green Technologies for a Sustainable Harbour: E- Harbours towards Sustainable, Clean and Energetic Innovative Harbour Cities in the North Sea Region. Pure Energy Centre, the e-harbour project & the NSR programme.

Eason, C. (2017). From cold ironing to electric bunkering. Retrieved from https://fathom.world/cold-ironing-electric-bunkering/.

Ericsson, P., & Fazlagic, I. (2008). Shore-side power supply - a feasibility study and a technical solution for an on-shore electrical infrastructure to supply vessels with electrical power while in port. Retrieved from http://studentarbeten.chalmers.se/publication/174062-shore-side-power-supply-a-feasibility-study-and-a-technical-solution-for-an-on-shore- electrical-infr

ESPO, 2012a. ESPO Green Guide: Toward Excellence in Port Environmental Management and Sustainability. European Sea Port Organizationhttps://doi.org/10.31826/9781463240134-toc.

ESPO, 2018. ESPO Environmental Report 2018: EcoPortsinSights. European Sea Port Organization.

Esteve, J., & Gutiérrez, J. (2015). Renewable energy supply to ships at port. Cartagena, Spain: Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/41823232.pdf.

European Alternative Fuels Observatory. (2019). What is onshore power supply (OPS)? Retrieved from https://www.eafo.eu/shipping- transport/port-infrastructure/ops/technology.

European Commission. (2020a). 2030 climate & energy framework. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/20 30_en

European Commission. (2020b). 2050 long-term strategy. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/20 50_en.

European Parliament. (2001a). Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants. Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2001/80/oj/eng.

European Parliament. (2001b). Directive 2001/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 October 2001 on national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants. Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2001/81/oj/eng.

Ferrari, C., Arduino, G., & Carrillo, D. (2011). Key factors and barriers to the adoption of cold ironing in Europe. Messina. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/16808316/KEY_FACTORS_AND_BARRIERS_TO_THE_ADOPTION_OF_ COLD_IRONING_IN_EUROPE

Gibbs, D., Rigot-Muller, P., Mangan, J., Lalwani, C., 2014. The role of sea ports in end-to-end maritime transport chain emissions. Energy Policy 64, 337–348. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.024.

Gonzalez-Aregall, M., Bergqvist, R., Monios, J., 2018. A global review of the hinterland dimension of green port strategies. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 59, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.013.

Green Efforts, 2014. Green and Effective Operations at Terminals and in Ports -deliverable 12.1- Recommendations Manual for Terminals. European Commission.

Gu, Y., Wallace, S.W., Wang, X., 2019. Can an emission trading scheme really reduce CO2 emissions in the short term? Evidence from a maritime fleet composition and de- ployment model. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 74, 318–338. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.009.

Gutiérrez, J. (2019). Energy analysis and costs estimation of an on-shore power supply system in the port of Gävle.

I2S2, 2013. Environmental Initiatives at Seaports Worldwide: A Snapshot of Best Practices. International Institute for Sustainable Seaports (I2S2), VA, USA. https:// doi.org/10.1061/40680(2003)95.

IAPH, 2007. IAPH Tool Box for Port Clean Air Programs. International Association of Ports & Harbours.

International Association of Ports & Harbours.

IMO. (2005). MEPC 54/4/3 prevention of air pollution from Ships Proposal to initiate a standardization process for on-shore power supply (cold ironing)

IMO. (2006a). BLG 10/14/3 review of MARPOL annex VI and the NOx technical code proposal to initiate a standardization process for on-shore power supply (cold ironing) submitted by Germany and Sweden. Retrieved from https://docs.imo.org/Shared/Download.aspx?did=35256.

IMO. (2006b). MEPC 55/4/10 prevention of air pollution from Ships Standardization of on-shore power supply submitted by the institute of marine engineering, science and technology (IMarEST). Retrieved from https://docs.imo.org/Shared/Download.aspx?did=38754.

IMO. (2006c). MEPC 55/4/13 prevention of air pollution from Ships Standardization of on-shore power supply submitted by Sweden. Retrieved from https://docs.imo.org/Shared/Download.aspx?did=38814.

IMO. (2006d). MEPC 55/4/6 Prevention of air pollution from Ships Standardization of on-shore power supply liaison with international and intergovernmental organizations note by the secretariat. Retrieved from https://docs.imo.org/Shared/Download.aspx?did=38565.

IMO. (2012). MEPC.1/circ.794 On-shore power supply. London: Retrieved from http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Po llutionPrevention/AirPollution/Documents/Circ.794.pdf

IMO, 2015. Study of Emission Control and Energy Efficiency Measures for Ships in the Port Area. International Maritime Organization, London: UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

IMO. (2017). SSE 5/13/1 development of guidelines for cold ironing of ships and of amendments to SOLAS chapters II-1 and II-2, if necessary Explanatory notes for the draft guidelines on safe operation of on-shore power supply (OPS) service in port for ships engaged on international voyages submitted by China. Retrieved from https://docs.imo.org/Shared/Download.aspx?did=107457.

IMO, 2018a. Port Emission Toolkit Guide No.1: Assessment of Port Emission. GloMeep project coordination unit and the International Maritime Organization, UK: London.

IMO, 2018b. Port Emission Toolkit Guide no.2: Development of Port Emission Reduction Strategies. GloMeep project coordination unit and the International Maritime Organization, London: UK.

IMO, 2018c. MEPC/72/17/ADD.1. Resolution MEPC.304(72): Initial IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships. International Maritime Organization, London: UK.

IMO, 2019. MEPC/74/18/ADD.1. Resolution MEPC.323(74): Inivitation to Member States to Encourage Voluntary Cooperation between the Port and Shipping Sectors to Contribute to Reducing GHG Emissions from Ships.

International Maritime Organization, London, UK.

Iris, Ç., Lam, J.S.L., 2019. A review of energy efficiency in ports: operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 112, 170– 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.069.

Jonathan, Y.C., Kader, S.B., 2018. Prospect of emission reduction standard for sustainable port equipment electrification. Int. J. Eng. 31, 1347–1355. https://doi.org/10.5829/ ije.2018.31.08b.25.

Kang, D., Kim, S., 2017. Conceptual model development of sustainability practices: the case of port operations for collaboration and governance. Sustainability 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122333.

Lam, J.S.L., Notteboom, T., 2014. The greening of ports: a comparison of port manage- ment tools used by leading ports in Asia and Europe. Transp. Rev. 34, 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.8911 62.

Lee, B., Low, J., Kim, K., 2015. Comparative evaluation of resource cycle strategies on operating and environmental impact in container terminals. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 41, 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.014.

Lim, S., Pettit, S., Abouarghoub, W., Beresford, A., 2019. Port sustainability and performance: a systematic literature review. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 72, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.009.

Lind, M., Bjorn-Andersen, N., Watson, R., Ward, R., Bergmann, M., Rylander, R., . . Santén, V. (2018). The potential role of PortCDM in cold ironing. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329674144_The_Potential_Role_of_PortCDM_in_Cold_Ironing

Lirn, T., Wu, Y.J., Chen, Y.J., 2013. Green performance criteria for sustainable ports in Asia. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 43, 427–451.

Mandersson, V. Cold ironing for Stena Line in Port of Trelleborg. Retrieved from https://www.shippax.com/en/news/cold-ironing-for-stena-line-in-port-of-trelleborg.aspx

Martínez-Moya, J., Vazquez-Paja, B., Maldonado, J.A.G., 2019. Energy efficiency and CO2 emissions of port container terminal equipment: evidence from the Port of Valencia. Energy Policy 131, 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.044.

Misra, A., Panchabikesan, K., Gowrishankar, S.K., Ayyasamy, E., Ramalingam, V., 2017. GHG emission accounting and mitigation strategies to reduce the carbon footprint in conventional port activities – a case of the Port of Chennai. Carbon Manag 8, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2016.12758 15.

Monios, J. (Eds.), Green Ports, pp. 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814054-3.00011-6.

Moon, D.S.H., Woo, J.K., Kim, T.G., 2018. Green ports and economic opportunities. In: Froholdt, L. (Ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility in the Maritime Industry. Springer, Cham, Malmö. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69143- 5_10.

Papoutsoglou, T. (2012). A cold ironing study on modern ports, implementation and benefits thriving for worldwide ports.

Peng, Y., Wang, W., Song, X., Zhang, Q., 2016. Optimal allocation of resources for yard crane network management to minimize carbon dioxide emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.120.

PIANC, 2019. Renewables and Energy Efficiency for Maritime Ports - MarCom WG Report n° 159- 2019. The World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure. PIANC Maritime Navigation Commission, Brussels: Belguim.

Port of Gothenburg. (2016). Onshore power supply for vessels. Retrieved from https://www.portofgothenburg.com/about-the- port/greener-transport/onshore-power-supply-for-vessels/.

Port of Gothenburg. (2018). OECD: Sweden – a pioneering nation in green shipping. Retrieved from https://www.portofgothenburg.com/news-room/news/oecd-sweden--a-pioneering-nation-in-green-shipping/.

Ports of Stockholm. (2014). Ports ordinance, and regulations. Stockholm, Sweden: Retrieved from https://www.portsofstockholm.com/siteassets/om-oss/tilltrade--sakerhet/port_regulations_and_ordinance_- 1_6_4.pdf

Ports of Stockholm. (2018). Solar cell systems. Retrieved from https://www.portsofstockholm.com/about-us/environmental-work/environmental-measures/solar-cell-systems/.

Ports of Stockholm. (2019a). Environmental measures. Retrieved from https://www.portsofstockholm.com/about-us/environmental-work/environmental-measures/.

Ports of Stockholm. (2019b). The power is on at the Värtahamnen port and several vessels are already connected. Retrieved from https://www.portsofstockholm.com/about-us/news/2019/the-power-is-on-at-the-varta-port-and-several-vessels-are-already-connected/

Poulsen, R.T., Ponte, S., Sornn-Friese, H., 2018. Environmental upgrading in global value chains: the potential and limitations of ports in the greening of maritime transport. Geoforum 89,  83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.011.

Puig, M., Michail, A., Wooldridge, C., Darbra, R.M., 2017. Benchmark dynamics in the environmental performance of ports. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 121, 111–119. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.05.021.

Ramos, V., Carballo, R., Álvarez, M., Sánchez, M., Iglesias, G., 2014. A port towards energy self-sufficiency using tidal stream power. Energy 71, 432–444. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.098.

Rosa-Santos, P., Taveira-Pinto, F., Clemente, D., Cabral, T., Fiorentin, F., Belga, F., Morais, T., 2019. Experimental study of a hybrid wave energy converter integrated in a harbor breakwater. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7020033.

SCAQMD/CARB, 2015. Technology Assessment: Commercial Harbor Craft. South Coast Air Quality Management District & California Air Resources Board, USA.

Schmidt, J., 2019. Action Plan for Sustainable and Low-Carbon Port of Bar. SUPAIR Sustainable Ports in the Adriatic-Ionian Region.

Sdoukopoulos, E., Boile, M., Tromaras, A., Anastasiadis, N., 2019. Energy efficiency in European ports: state-of-practice and insights on the way forward. Sustain 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184952.

Styhre, L., & Hulda, W. (2016). Energy efficient port calls A study of swedish shipping with international outlooks. Stockholm, Sweden: submitted by Germany and Sweden. Retrieved from https://docs.imo.org/Shared/Download.aspx?did=35124.

Sweden.se. (2015). Energy use in sweden. Retrieved from https://sweden.se/nature/energy-use-in-sweden/.

Swedish environmental code, CodeU.S.C. (1998). Retrieved from https://www.government.se/contentassets/be5e4 d4ebdb4499f8d6365720ae68724/the-swedish-environmental-code-ds-200061.

The constitution of sweden, (1974). Retrieved from http://libris.kb.se/resource/bib/7771727. Transp. Bus. Manag. 17, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.11.002.

Tsai, Y.T., Liang, C.J., Huang, K.H., Hung, K.H., Jheng, C.W., Liang, J.J., 2018. Self-management of greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions in Taichung Port, Taiwan. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 63, 576–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.

Tzannatos, E., 2010. Cost assessment of ship emission reduction methods at berth: the case of the port of Piraeus, Greece. Marit. Policy Manag. 37, 427–445. https://doi. org/10.1080/03088839.2010.486655.

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. (2015). On Shore Power Supply and LNG.

Wilmsmeier, G., Spengler, T., 2016. Energy consumption and container terminal efficiency. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribian. FAL Bull. 6, 1–10.

Wilske, Å. (2020). Examining the commercial viability of cold ironing. Retrieved from http://www.ops.wpci.nl/_images/_downloads/_or iginal/1265119200_greenshippingonshorepowers upply19nov2009asawilskeportofgothenburgfinal.pdf

WPCI, 2010. Carbon Footprinting for Ports: Guidance Document. World Port Climate Initiative.

Yang, Y.-C., 2015. Determinants of container terminal operation from a green port perspective. Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist. 7, 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL. 2015.069123.

Zanetti, S. (2013). IS COLD IRONING HOT ENOUGH? An actor focus perspective of on shore power supply (OPS) at Copenhagen's harbour.

Zis, T. (2018). The prospects of cold ironing as an emissions reduction option. Retrieved from https://www.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od=od1202::064070dd7a8d37e31dacf3 bc5b022fb5